Effect of Saw Dust Ash and Rice Husk Ash on some Geotechnical Properties of Makurdi Burnt Clay Bricks

  • Yala A. Iorliam Department of Civil Engineering, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University Makurdi, Makurdi, Nigeria
  • John T. Tile Department of Civil Engineering, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University Makurdi, Makurdi, Nigeria
  • Jeremiah T. Ukya Department of Civil Engineering, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University Makurdi, Makurdi, Nigeria

Abstract

The use of cheap and waste materials in bricks production have been encouraged as an alternative to industrial stabilizers due to high cost of cement or lime for production of stabilized bricks. This study looks at the potential of using wastes like saw dust ash (SDA) and rice husk ash (RHA) mixture in treatment of Makurdi clay for burnt bricks production and its subsequent assessment for structural building bricks. Makurdi clay was treated with SDA and RHA mixture, each at 0%, 2%, 4% and 6% respectively. The compressive strength of the burnt bricks increased from 9.40 MN/  for untreated brick to a maximum value of 11.29 MN/  for 2%SDA+2%RHA treated burnt bricks. Treatment with waste mixtures above this content resulted in decreased strength. The water absorption of 14.9% for untreated burnt brick increased to a value of 16.2 % for 2%SDA+2% RHA treated burnt brick. Treatment with higher waste mixture additions resulted in increased water absorption up to 19.4% for 6%SDA+6% RHA treated burnt brick. Energy Dispersion X-ray Spectrometer results showed the presence of calcium, silicate and aluminate as a cementitious compound in the 2%SDA+2%RHA treated burnt brick. The compressive strength value of 11.29 MN/  is greater than 10.3 MN/  which is the minimum value suitable for structural building bricks in grade negligible weather based on ASTM C62-99. Thus 2%SDA+2%RHA treated burnt brick from Makurdi clay is recommended for structural building bricks in grade negligible weather

References

Adebayo, K., & Balarabe, F. (2021). Effect of saw dust ash on index and engineering properties of a weak lateritic soil. FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology (FUOYEJET), 6(3), 68-72. Doi.org/10.46792/fuoyejet.v6i3.648.

Agbede, I. O., & Joel, M. (2011). Effect of rice husk ash (RHA) on the properties of Ibaji burnt clay bricks. American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 2(4), 674-677. Doi:10.5251/ajsir.2011.2.4.674.677

Agboola, J. B., Hassan, B. S. and Lukman, A. A. (2021). Development of Sugarcane Bagasse Reinforced Onibode Clay Composite for Engineering Applications. FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology (FUOYEJET), 6(3), 52-55. Doi.org/10.46792/fuoyejet.v6i3.54

ASTM (1992). ‘Annual Book of ASTM Standard’. American Society for Testing and Material, Philadelphia.

ASTM C311 (2016). Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Fly Ash or Natural Pozzolans for Use in Portland-Cement Concrete. American Society for Testing and Material, West Conshohocken, PA, 1994 pp. 1–10.

ASTM C62-99 (2000). Standard Specification for Building Brick (Solid Masonry Units Made From Clay or Shale). Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.

ASTM D698-12 (2021). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)). American Society for Testing and Material West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 1–13.

ASTM D4318-10 (2017). Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. American Society for Testing and Material, West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 1–16.

Bye, G. (2011). Portland Cement. Third Edition. Institute of Civil Engineers Publishing. ISBN: 978-0-7277-3611-6.

Chindaprasirt, P., De Silva, P., Sagoe-Crentsil, K., & Hanjitsuwan, S. (2012). Effect of SiO 2 and Al2O3 on the setting and hardening of high calcium fly ash-based geopolymer systems. Journal of Materials Science, 47, 4876-4883. DOI 10.1007/s10853-012-6353-y.

Cultrone, G., Aurrekoetxea, I., Casado, C., & Arizzi, A. (2020). Sawdust recycling in the production of lightweight bricks: How the amount of additive and the firing temperature influence the physical properties of the bricks. Construction and Building Materials, 235, 117436. Doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117436 0950-0618.

De Silva, G. S., & Perera, B. V. A. (2018). Effect of waste rice husk ash (RHA) on structural, thermal and acoustic properties of fired clay bricks. Journal of building engineering, 18, 252-259. Doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.03.019.

Demir, I. (2008). Effect of Organic Residues Addition on the Technological Properties of Clay Bricks. Waste management, 28(3) 622-627. Doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.03.019

Ewemoje, O. E., & Bademosi, T. T. (2019). Development of a Sludge Dewatering Filter and Utilization of Dried Sludge in Brick Making. FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(1), pp. 76-81

Felekoğlu, B., Türkel, S., & Kalyoncu, H. (2009). Optimization of fineness to maximize the strength activity of high-calcium ground fly ash–Portland cement composites. Construction and Building Materials, 23(5), 2053-2061. DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.024

Hwang, C. L., & Huynh, T. P. (2015). Evaluation of the performance and microstructure of ecofriendly construction bricks made with fly ash and residual rice husk ash. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2015. Doi.org/10.1155/2015/891412

Kazmi, S. M., Abbas, S., Saleem, M. A., Munir, M. J., & Khitab, A. (2016). Manufacturing of sustainable clay bricks: Utilization of waste sugarcane bagasse and rice husk ashes. Construction and building materials, 120, 29-41. Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Conbuildmat.2016.05.084

Khoo, Y. C., Johari, I., & Ahmad, Z. A. (2013). Influence of rice husk ash on the engineering properties of fired-clay brick. In Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 795, pp. 14-18). Trans Tech Publications Ltd. Doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.795.14

Kongkajun, N., Laitila, E. A., Ineure, P., Prakaypan, W., Cherdhirunkorn, B., & Chakartnarodom, P. (2020). Soil-cement bricks produced from local clay brick waste and soft sludge from fiber cement production. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 13, e00448. Doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00448.

Makurdi, Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia’ httpen.wikipedia.orgwikiMakurdi, (accessed August 24, (2022).

Menéndez, E., Argiz, C., & Sanjuán, M. Á. (2021). Reactivity of Ground Coal Bottom Ash to Be Used in Portland Cement. Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal, 4(3), 223-232. Doi.org/10.3390/j4030018

NIS 87 (2000). Nigerian Industrial Standard: Standard for Sandcrete Blocks. Standard Organisation of Nigeria, Lagos, Nigeria.

Ogunbiyi, M. A., Samson, R. A., Oginni, F. A., & Akerele, E. (2014). Comparative study of cement stabilized clay brick and sandcrete block as a building component. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 4(6).

Olorunnisola, A. O. (2019). Development of sustainable building materials from agro-industrial wastes in Nigeria. In Sustainable Construction and Building Materials (pp. 55-74). London, UK: IntechOpen.

Olutoge, F. A., Booth, C. A., Olawale, S. O. A., & Alebiosu, O. A. (2018). Lateritic cement-and lime-stabilised bricks and blocks for affordable housing. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Construction Materials, 171(5), 195-202. Doi.org/10.1680/jcoma.16.00062

USCS (1962): Unified Soil Classification System for Roads, Airfields, Embankments and Foundations’ Military Standard, MIL-STD619A, US. Dept. of Defence, Washington D.C.

Vitale, E., Deneele, D., & Russo, G. (2020). Microstructural investigations on plasticity of lime-treated soils. Minerals, 10(5), 386. Doi:10.3390/min10050386.

Published
2023-06-30